HPPavilion Aero 13-be0190AU (4R829PA) ( AMD Hexa Core Ryzen 5 / 16 GB / Windows 10 ) Laptop Price in India is Rs. 63,490. Check out Pavilion Aero 13-be0190AU (4R829PA) Reviews & Specifications and Buy online across Delhi, Mumbai, Chennai and Hyderabad. Heyguys..😎😎In this video i explain what is dual core , quad core , hexa core, octa core, deca core processorDeca core is latest in the marketDeca core fas Comparisonbetween Rockchip PX6 and Hexa core with the specifications of the processors, the number of cores, threads, cache memory, also the performance in benchmark platforms such as Geekbench 4, Passmark, Cinebench or AnTuTu. This version of Cinebench takes into account recent developments in processors with multiple cores and the latest Vay Tiền Trả Góp Theo Tháng Chỉ Cần Cmnd Hỗ Trợ Nợ Xấu. Contents What Is a CPU Core?What Do Cores Do in a CPU?How Do More Cores Affect Performance on Windows 10?So, More Is Better? The Central Processing Unit CPU of a computer’s most important component. It’s essentially the brain that makes calculations and decisions about how to run every task and operation on a PC. The CPU is integral to a PC. For example, you can still use the computer without a dedicated video card, a network card, or even a sound card. However, without the processor, you merely have an expensive piece of industrial brick. There are various ways to categorize the CPU—by manufacturer, generation, or clock speed among others. However, the most important method of classification is by how many cores they have. Using that yardstick, there are two main CPU types the single-core CPU and the multi-core CPU. Single-core processors are all but extinct at this time so we only have computers whose processors use between two and eight cores. However, does it matter how many cores a processor has and how many your CPU needs? This article answers these questions. We’ll explain each type of CPU and how your choice of processor correlates to performance. What Is a CPU Core? A CPU is a computer’s processor chip that executes instructions fed to it by a computer program. On a Windows 10 PC, that program is the operating system. The main component of a CPU is the processing unit or core. The core is responsible for reading and executing program instructions. If the processor is like the human brain, then the processing unit or core is like the cerebrum. It’s the part that carries out the primary functions of the CPU. Now, just like the human cerebrum is divided into right and left portions, a CPU can have more than one processing unit. The more cores there are, the faster the tasks are carried out. A computer with one processor core can carry out a single task at a time. Although it may perform the task very fast it must finish before it can do something else. On the other hand, multiple cores help speed up system operations because the computer treats each core as a different processor. It assigns tasks to each one simultaneously. With multiple tasks being done at the same time, both speed and performance are increased. In the early days of the computing system, processors only had one core because of the limits of technology at that time. Nowadays, a single-core CPU is a rare thing; every consumer PC comes with at least a two-core processor. What Do Cores Do in a CPU? When it’s time to purchase a new computer, many users are confused about labels like “dual-core”, “quad-core,” and so on. They might wonder what cores do exactly and why the number of cores matters. Strictly speaking, a core is equivalent to a CPU. Most modern computers have multiple cores on a processor chip. In effect, the system has more than one CPU to use at a time. The operating system distributes tasks among the cores to ensure the smooth running of computer programs. Depending on what you wish to do with your system, you probably need one with multiple cores. How Do More Cores Affect Performance on Windows 10? Sure, you might not mind splurging on the latest and greatest PC if you have the money. However, it might be better to tailor your purchase according to your needs. The kind of PC you buy should be designed for the kind of programs you want to run on it. Also, remember that performance is not only dependent on hardware but software as well. Too many junk files on the hard drive, corrupted memory, and even invalid registry keys can make a PC with adequate specs perform far less than the sum of its parts. A PC cleanup utility like Auslogics BoostSpeed will help you restore the performance to the normal level. For basic tasks like browsing, watching videos, playing music, and using basic productivity apps like Word and Excel, a computer with two or four cores might be sufficient for your needs. For gaming and video editing, you should choose a good computer that has between four and eight cores as the increased number of cores will be better able to handle the extensive operations that gaming and graphics editing involves. For complex workstations that require graphics rendering, you’re better off splurging on one of the specialized beasts out there with at least 12 cores. You can even find up to 64 cores for the most extreme resource-demanding tasks like 3D animation rendering and on-site network computing. These are the common types of CPU based on the number of cores Single-core CPU or processor with one core. Dual-core CPU or processor with 2 cores. Quad-core CPU or processor with 4 cores. Hexa-core CPU or processor with 6 cores. Octa-core CPU or processor with 8 cores. Deca-core CPU or processor with 10 cores. Duodeca-core CPU or processor with 12 cores. Let’s look at each one in turn. Single-Core CPU The age of microprocessors began with a one-core CPU. Even though it could only perform a single operation at a time, it was still an improvement over what came before. Nowadays, the only place to easily find a processor with one core is in a tech museum. Dual-Core CPU Processor chips with two cores can be found in most entry-level computers. Examples of two-core CPUs are the Intel Core Duo and the AMD X2. They use two processors on a single chip. Dual-core computers are very budget-friendly and allow you to do a few basic tasks at a time. You can play media files and perform simple browsing, type out documents and play old Super Mario games without overloading the CPU. Quad-Core CPU A computer with four cores is good enough for regular tasks like gaming, basic video editing, and multi-productivity work. The Intel 6th and 7th generation chips are mostly quad-core. Hexa-Core CPU You can find processors with six cores in many of the latest mid-range gaming and graphics editing laptops around. If you’re looking for a machine that can handily perform advanced video editing 3D rendering, and play AAA games comfortably, you can go for a hexa-core chip. However, the PC should also be paired with at least 8GB of RAM to take full advantage of the parallel processing. Octa-Core CPU This type of chip is found in high-performance computers used by engineers, architects, and specialized workers that do a lot of complex graphics rendering. If you’re a professional gamer or a programmer that uses software that needs a lot of resources, an 8-core PC may be the best tool for your trade. Deca-Core CPU Any computer with a 10-core chip should easily handle anything you throw at it, all other things being equal. The Intel Core i9-10850K is an example of a deca-core chip produced for gaming desktops. Playing the heaviest games at 4K, virtual reality, and advanced software mapping will be a breeze with this type of processor. Duodeca-Core CPU and Above In recent times, CPUs with more and more cores are being released for the most demanding operations a computer could ever do. Examples are the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X with 12 cores, Intel Core I9-9980XE Extreme Edition with 18 cores, and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X with 24 cores. These are performance monsters for deep-pocketed users looking for a specific technology. So, More Is Better? There is a pretty straightforward correlation between the number of cores on a PC and its optimum performance. But not always. Other factors that determine how fast a computer is. Apart from the number of cores, you have to consider the number of threads as well. Threading is the ability to run multiple processes on a single chip at a time. Some chip makers added threading capability to their better chips to further boost performance. So, thanks to threading capability, a quad-core computer might be able to run 8 processes at once while a hexa-core computer is limited to just six processes. In that case, the 4-core PC with threading capability is the better choice as it allows for better multitasking and enhanced performance. For the best value when shopping for a new PC, you should be on the lookout for CPUs with multithreading capability. Intel calls theirs Hyper-Threading and AMD calls theirs Simultaneous Multithreading. The CPU’s clock speed is another factor to consider. Clock speed is the rate at which the processor operates, defined as the completion of one processing cycle and measured in gigahertz. A general rule of thumb with clock speeds higher is better. Of course, the storage and RAM affect the speed of the processor as well. For the best results, you should go for a computer that pairs a good CPU with a fast SSD and at least a DDR4 memory. We hope this article has increased your knowledge of computer processors. With this, you’ll go into your next PC purchase better informed. Given that PCs with 8 cores and above aren’t exactly cheap, you may need several rounds of saving to get what you want. In the meantime, you can use the Optimize Tool in Auslogics BoostSpeed to finetune your current PC for the best performance. When purchasing a new laptop or building a computer, the processor is the most important decision. But there's a lot of jargon, especially the cores. For example, do you need a dual-core processor, a quad-core, a hexacore, an octa-core, or more? Let's cut the jargon and understand what it all really means. Dual-Core vs. Quad-Core, Explained Here's everything you need to know There is always only one processor chip. That chip can have one, two, four, six, eight, ten, twelve, or even sixteen cores. So if you find a "single core" CPU, that means the processor chip has one core. And a dual-core processor has two cores, a quad-core has four, a hexa-core has six, an octa-core has eight, and so on. Currently, an 18-core processor is the best you can get in consumer PCs. I mean, you could buy a 64-core AMD Threadripper, which is available to consumers, but that's more processing power than most regular consumers could think of using. Each "core" is the part of the chip that does the processing work. Essentially, each core is a central processing unit CPU. This article deals with dual-core vs. quad-core processors for computers, not for smartphones. We have a separate post on understanding smartphone cores. The Difference Between Dual-Core and Quad-Core CPUs You might think more cores will make your processor faster overall, but that's not always the case. It's a little more complicated than that. More cores are faster only if a program can split its tasks between the cores. Not all programs are developed to split tasks between cores. More on this later. Each core's clock speed is also a crucial factor in speed, as is the architecture. A newer dual-core CPU with a higher clock speed will often outperform an older quad-core CPU with a lower clock speed. Power Consumption More cores also lead to higher power consumption by the processor. When the processor is switched on, it supplies power to all the cores, not just one at a time. Chip makers have been trying to reduce power consumption and make processors more energy efficient. But as a general rule of thumb, a quad-core processor will draw more power from your laptop and thus make it run out of battery faster. More Cores Equal More Heat More factors than the core affect the heat generated by a processor. But again, as a general rule, more cores lead to more heat. Due to this additional heat, manufacturers need to add better heat sinks or other cooling solutions. Are Quad-Core CPUs More Expensive Than Dual-Core? More cores isn't always a higher price. Like we said earlier, clock speed, architecture versions, and other considerations come into play. But if all other factors are the same, then more cores will fetch a higher price. Software Optimization for CPU Cores Here's the dirty little secret that chip manufacturers don't want you to know. It's not always about how many cores you are running; it's about what software you are running on them. Programs have to be specifically developed to take advantage of multiple processors. In the past, "multi-threaded software" wasn't as common, although as it's near-impossible to buy a single-core CPU these days, this issue isn't once what it was. However, it's important to note that even if it's a multi-threaded program, it's also about what it is used for. For example, the Google Chrome web browser supports multiple processes, as does video editing software Adobe Premiere Pro. Adobe Premiere Pro instructs different cores to work on different aspects of your edit. Considering the many layers involved in video editing, this makes sense, as each core can work on a separate task. Similarly, Google Chrome instructs different cores to work on different tabs. But herein lies the problem. Once you open a web page in a tab, it is usually static after that. There is no further processing work needed; the rest of the work is about storing the page in the RAM. This means even though the core can be used for a background tab, it is unnecessary. This Google Chrome example is an illustration of how even multi-threaded software might not give you much of a real-world performance boost. Double the Cores Is Not Double the Speed So let's say you have the right software and all your other hardware is the same. Would a quad-core processor then be twice as fast as a dual-core processor? Nope. Increasing cores does not address the software problem of scaling. Scaling to cores is the theoretical ability of any software to assign the right tasks to the right cores, so each core is computing at its optimal speed. That's not what happens in reality. In reality, tasks are split sequentially which most multi-threaded software does or randomly. For example, let's say you have a quad-core processor Core1, Core2, Core3, Core4. You need to accomplish three tasks T1, T2, T3 to finish an action, and you have five actions A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 like this. Here's how the software will divide tasks Core1 = A1T1 Core2 = A1T2 Core3 = A1T3 Core4 = A2T1 The software is not smart, though. If A1T3 is the hardest and longest task, the software should have split A1T3 between Core3 and Core4. But now, even after Core1 and Core2 finish their tasks, they have to wait for the slower Core3's task to complete the action. All of this is a roundabout way of saying that not all software is optimized to take full advantage of multiple cores. And doubling the cores does not always equal doubling the speeds. Where Do More Cores Really Help? Now that you know what cores do and their restrictions in boosting performance, you must be asking yourself, "Do I need more cores?" Well, it depends on what you plan to do with them. Dual-Core and Quad-Core in Gaming If you fancy yourself to be a gamer, then get more cores on a gaming PC. The vast majority of new AAA titles popular games from big studios support multi-threaded architecture. Video games are still largely dependent on the graphics card to look good, but a multi-core processor helps too. Editing Videos or Audio For any professional who works with video or audio programs, more cores will be beneficial. Most of the popular audio and video editing tools take advantage of multi-threaded processing. Photoshop and Design If you're a designer, a higher clock speed and more processor cache will increase speeds better than more cores. Even the most popular design software, Adobe Photoshop, largely supports single-threaded or lightly threaded processes. Multiple cores aren't going to be a significant boost with this. Should You Get More Cores? Overall, a quad-core processor is going to perform faster than a dual-core processor for general computing. Each program you open will work on its own core, so if the tasks are shared, the speeds are better. If you use a lot of programs simultaneously, switch between them often, and assign them their own tasks, then get a processor with more cores. Just know this overall system performance is one area where far too many factors come into play. Don't expect a magical boost by changing one component like the processor. Choose wisely and buy the right processor for your needs. You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites should upgrade or use an alternative browser. 1 Hey guys, if I'm looking forward to buy a cpu with a hefty budget to spend, what processor should I buy? An octa core or a hexa core one considering that I don't want to upgrade cpu again for atleast 5-6 years Alpha3031 Apr 9, 2015 Form Please fill. Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 2 Form Please fill. 3 I said "if" Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 4 If it were me the minimum core count for an intel CPU would be 6 cores if your wanting 5+ years out of it, 8 would be better. I would also plan on overclocking to squeeze more performance from my CPU over time. Ex. I got a i7 3930k 3 years ago. i initially overclocked it to January made some new OC profiles stable up to maybe but it needs more testing still to be sure. It allows me to get more from my cpu over time. Yeah i could have cranked up the core speed from the get go but i would not have seen the benefits later as it would have already felt like the norm, plus when you OC you wear things out faster so there is that to consider in the parts longevity. Sep 30, 2012 1,269 1 11,960 5 You kinda answered your own question. You'll obviously want to buy the absolute best you can afford if you want maximum longevity, and right now with x99, the choice is even more clear-cut than with previous x79 setups since with the current lineup, the top-end i7 has more cores than the model down. Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 6 [quotemsg=15647161,0,1935761]I said "if" [/quotemsg] Well, if we have no idea what you're going to do with it, how are we supposed to make suggestions? For all we know, you could want the CPU to surf the web with. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 7 [quotemsg=15647180,0,936635]You kinda answered your own question. You'll obviously want to buy the absolute best you can afford if you want maximum longevity, and right now with x99, the choice is even more clear-cut than with previous x79 setups since with the current lineup, the top-end i7 has more cores than the model down.[/quotemsg] kinda true 8 it depends, we talking 6300 or 9590? or 5820k or 5960x 9 Intel only. 5820k/5930k and 5960x 10 This thread is under PC gaming category. So obviously I am a gamer. And I am confused because some hexa cores outperform the 5960x in benchmarks Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 11 [quotemsg=15648418,0,1935761]This thread is under PC gaming category. So obviously I am a gamer. And I am confused because some hexa cores outperform the 5960x in benchmarks[/quotemsg] while true for the moment heck some quad core's out perform hexa cores as well...clock speed, architecture make a difference. That said with consoles having 8 core CPU's and multi-core/ multi-thread CPUs in PC becoming common place. In the next few years 8 cores/threads+ could well be the new gold standard. The Op was wanting something for 5+ years so it's reasonable to think two more cores will be useful in that time frame instead of just six. 12 [quotemsg=15648418,0,1935761]This thread is under PC gaming category. So obviously I am a gamer. And I am confused because some hexa cores outperform the 5960x in benchmarks[/quotemsg] Because the 5960x isnt meant for gaming.... hence its low stock clock speed. The 4790k is the best gaming CPU out right now. The extreme series Haswell-e is for enthusiast builders, video editors, servers.. etc not gamers. Go with the 4790k and you should be gold for about 4-5 years. Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 13 I'd go 5820K and custom liquid cooling. Plenty of space for 3/4 GPU setups. you'll need a full tower case too. Though it does depend on what games you play. Some games still only use one or two cores. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 14 [quotemsg=15648940,0,1493684]I'd go 5820K and custom liquid cooling. Plenty of space for 3/4 GPU setups. you'll need a full tower case too. Though it does depend on what games you play. Some games still only use one or two cores.[/quotemsg] yeah i have to disagree with the 3 to 4 GPU part...the 5820k only has 20 PCIe lanes...good for dual GPU or single GPU and an SSD but not both, there are just not enough PCIe lanes to handle it. In fact many Mobo manufacturers warn users of this in their Mobo website/users manuals online. That is exactly why there is a 5830k with 40 PCIe lanes to handle that kind of bandwidth. Not to say the 5820k is a bad CPU but one needs to be aware of it's strengths and weaknesses before making a choice. And yes i have seen all the charts showing the "minimal" loss in frames even when dropping a GPU to PCIe 4x but if your spending the kind of money one is spending on a Extreme Series MOBO and CPU it hardly makes sense to kneecap your gaming performance even if ever so slightly for the get go. Call me crazy. Oct 19, 2007 3,226 6 21,415 15 Wait till DX12 comes out. It "might" be a game changer in terms of number of cores in a cpu. Its a rather smart move to wait and see roudups in games and other software on dx12. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 16 [quotemsg=15649243,0,151198]Wait till DX12 comes out. It "might" be a game changer in terms of number of cores in a cpu. Its a rather smart move to wait and see roudups in games and other software on dx12.[/quotemsg] yeah something to be said for that...down side though even with windows 10 launching this summer it will probably be 2016 before we see DX12 games or very many of them at least. So you could wait and if you can it might be worth it but generally speaking i buy whats available and best today...not tomorrow. The future is always uncertain and computers change at break neck pace. Though it's slowing, if you ask me, on the CPU side...sandy bridge to ivy bridge to haswell....the gains are minimal performance wise and in some cases a back step though power efficiency is much better with the newer generations. Sadly efficiency seems to be the focus not pure performance anymore. 17 I was thinking about buying the best octa core processor by this fall in time for black froday sales along wuth a dual gpu probably 980Ti which would be launched by then. Can a mid tower cabinet with asus x99-a support that? Nov 27, 2013 2,902 0 13,460 18 [quotemsg=15649095,0,146991]yeah i have to disagree with the 3 to 4 GPU part...the 5820k only has 20 PCIe lanes...good for dual GPU or single GPU and an SSD but not both, there are just not enough PCIe lanes to handle it. In fact many Mobo manufacturers warn users of this in their Mobo website/users manuals online. That is exactly why there is a 5830k with 40 PCIe lanes to handle that kind of bandwidth. Not to say the 5820k is a bad CPU but one needs to be aware of it's strengths and weaknesses before making a choice. And yes i have seen all the charts showing the "minimal" loss in frames even when dropping a GPU to PCIe 4x but if your spending the kind of money one is spending on a Extreme Series MOBO and CPU it hardly makes sense to kneecap your gaming performance even if ever so slightly for the get go. Call me crazy. [/quotemsg] I probably should have added something to my post that said I was sleepy and not to take me seriously. Still, some boards do have PCI-E lane multiplier thingamajigs. 5820K for 2 GPU, 5930K for 3 GPU. though if you get the dual GPU cards... Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 19 [quotemsg=15653911,0,1493684][quotemsg=15649095,0,146991]yeah i have to disagree with the 3 to 4 GPU part...the 5820k only has 20 PCIe lanes...good for dual GPU or single GPU and an SSD but not both, there are just not enough PCIe lanes to handle it. In fact many Mobo manufacturers warn users of this in their Mobo website/users manuals online. That is exactly why there is a 5830k with 40 PCIe lanes to handle that kind of bandwidth. Not to say the 5820k is a bad CPU but one needs to be aware of it's strengths and weaknesses before making a choice. And yes i have seen all the charts showing the "minimal" loss in frames even when dropping a GPU to PCIe 4x but if your spending the kind of money one is spending on a Extreme Series MOBO and CPU it hardly makes sense to kneecap your gaming performance even if ever so slightly for the get go. Call me crazy. [/quotemsg] I probably should have added something to my post that said I was sleepy and not to take me seriously. Still, some boards do have PCI-E lane multiplier thingamajigs. 5820K for 2 GPU, 5930K for 3 GPU. though if you get the dual GPU cards...[/quotemsg] LOL been there brother...yeah you can get a multiplier as mentioned on some motherboards but it adds latency and is generally not the best option IMO. Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 21 [quotemsg=15654560,0,1935761]5820k can run sli? [/quotemsg] yes but its best suited for dual card or single GPU with an SSD. thats what we were talking about. if you want to do three or four GPUs..or even a dual GPU with an SSD which uses 4 PCIe lanes, then it becomes less ideal and you want the i7 5930k for the greater PCIe lanes it has. 22 pointless to use more than a 2 way sli. If I go for a haswell e cpu, I will have to keep x99. But I'm afraid I will have to upgrade my gpu in few years to next gen, nvlink stuff. Will my x99 support that? Sep 4, 2007 6,360 476 43,990 23 [quotemsg=15654811,0,1935761]pointless to use more than a 2 way sli. If I go for a haswell e cpu, I will have to keep x99. But I'm afraid I will have to upgrade my gpu in few years to next gen, nvlink stuff. Will my x99 support that? [/quotemsg] Yes and no. i run dual gpu plus a card for physx 3 GPUs and there for I need the PCIe lanes, one reason i have a i7 3930k compared to a quad core, that and i do a lot of video encoding...i have enough physx games in my library a dedicated physx is worth it for me. As for the NVlink i believe that come with pascal and there are no motherboards with that slot yet on the market. So its out of reach for now. 24 So should I go for cheaper 4790k and z97 extreme then? With 970 sli as I don't do anything else other than gaming. That should last me 4 or 5 years maybe. Jan 9, 2015 1,072 0 19,660 25 Honestly we have the 2 most exciting games in the last few years, coming next 2 month. This fact already worth to build a PC to play them on ultra. I think you shoudln'T worry about beeing future proof for 5-6 years, because it is impossible to do so. If you understand the Moore law in electronics, you'll already know why. Both Intel and nvidia's new architectures are in the gate. And actually if you own an expensive PC you can sell it whenever you want and rebuild from scratch. Especially with active warranty on the parts. The main decision you should make if you want to play in 4k or 1080p. - For 1080p a z97,i7 4790k and a single gtx 980 is the best choice. it maxes all games with 60fps+. Then when new architectures hit, you sell rebuild, simple as that. - For 4k gaming x99, i7 5930k, single or sli titan-x is the only smart choice. Note that people will tell things like 970 sli and 980 sli is good enough for 4k or 1440p, but they are wrong in both cases. The reason for this is the texture size that modern games use. the 970 is not even a choice for 1440p because of 3,5gb vram limitation. most of modern games are optimized to run on ultra on a 4gb card on 1080p resolution. With the titan-x and the 6core you would be a bit more future proof, but it's still not worth to wait the warranty to end, so you are in the same boat. For now, i'd advice to go 1080p and z97, single 980 with i7 4790 or 4790k, except if you have tons of disposable cash and you really want to go 4k now. Similar threads Advertising Cookies Policies Privacy Term & Conditions

hexa core vs octa core